3 ms·

You're not supposed to be able to see well through the device?

• jayd16 4y ago
  It's not promising to be able to drive with it. You can have the device on and see other people and the space around you while still interacting with virtual objects. You can safely operate the device in a cluttered space without clearing a 3x3 meter space.
• vineyardmike 4y ago
  It’s meant to be good enough to see someone walk up to you or not hit something like a dog underfoot. Maybe find a keyboard key instead of only touch type. It’s not meant to be as clear as your glasses so you can drive or take a vision test.
• gkoberger 4y ago
  Well, I'm sure in future versions it will be a lot better. But my experience with my Meta Quest Pro is that it's more for getting a vague idea of your surroundings than just interacting with them. For me, the only time I've seen it pop up is when I step out of my "zone". Rather than just flashing red, I get a vague understanding of where I'm standing and who's nearby. I've never had a problem with it at all, even though I acknowledge the picture isn't particularly great.
  • deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
  • Shank 4y ago
    > But my experience with my Meta Quest Pro is that it's more for getting a vague idea of your surroundings than just interacting with them. The point of the article is that this experience, while good, is juxtaposed with Meta's marketing claim that it's a mixed reality device. You're saying the device is good at the thing the author says it was probably built for. Mixed reality implies that you're seamlessly switching between environments, as if there wasn't a distinction.
• 2OEH8eoCRo0 4y ago
  I thought the purpose was to maintain awareness of surroundings while using the headset which it accomplishes. Not pass an eye test. It's bad at doing a thing that's window dressing.