5 ms·
I'd say a move toward a co-op would be too risky of a step for a billion-dollar company. The whole intent behind the Patagonia decision was to dethrone sharehol
by tony_cannistra 4y ago
I'd say a move toward a co-op would be too risky of a step for a billion-dollar company. The whole intent behind the Patagonia decision was to dethrone shareholder primacy while still maintaining some control / centralized governance.
- sschueller 4y agoWith all the brilliant minds out there finding all these tax constructs I am sure one could have found something that works if one really cared.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]