3 ms·

It would actually be great, I know freedom and whatnot but raising someone through the puberty ages is really tricky right now. The social media stuff is almos

It would actually be great, I know freedom and whatnot but raising someone through the puberty ages is really tricky right now. The social media stuff is almost worse than the porn, because banning your kid from it is blocking them from the main way their peers communicate. So you are left with the choice of letting their undeveloped brains get barraged by social media, or making them the odd one out at school.

chrisco255 4y ago
Pervasive government surveillance and censorship "for the children" is not great. Personally, I'd opt for teaching my kid to be the odd one out whenever it makes sense.
- ericmcer 4y ago
  So if your kid is struggling to fit in and everyone at the school talks and interacts via social media, and your kid asks if he can talk to friends via social media your answer would be to tell your 13 year old developing human who is struggling that they are gonna be the odd one out. This isn't the same as installing cameras on every corner because kids are getting kidnapped, this is the same thing as saying cigarettes/drugs/alcohol should be for people 18+ when they are old enough to decide for themselves, especially given all those things (and social media) has known negative impacts on developing brains.
  - Brybry 4y ago
    Unless you watch your kid like a hawk then they'll be able to get cigarettes/drugs/alcohol as a teenager if they want to. A significant portion of my high school population was drinking alcohol at parties and another (smaller) portion was smoking weed. My understanding from most of my friends and relatives is that their schools were the same. In my opinion kids are far better served by being enabled to safely explore new experiences and methods on how to deal with peer pressure when they don't want to. But really that's up to each parent to decide, they should know their kids best. 18 years old as a magical line for all human beings being equally capable to decide for themselves is a bit silly, if anything 18 year old males might be at the worst time for these experiences. If we wanted a good 'average' age to group everyone into that's based more on current understanding of biology then we'd probably want something more like 25.
ipaddr 4y ago
The answer to you having a difficult time parenting is for everyone to use a government issued id for any content you want to ban your kid from using? Why not install filtering in your home router and kids cellphones?
- _-david-_ 4y ago
  >Why not install filtering in your home router and kids cellphones? The average parent is incompetent when it comes to technology. They wouldn't know what to use and would likely install some sort of malware. Perhaps Microsoft and Apple could implement something in their systems or the ISPs. If it is up to the parents to find the appropriate solution it just won't work.

chrisco255 4y ago

Pervasive government surveillance and censorship "for the children" is not great. Personally, I'd opt for teaching my kid to be the odd one out whenever it makes sense.

ericmcer 4y ago
So if your kid is struggling to fit in and everyone at the school talks and interacts via social media, and your kid asks if he can talk to friends via social media your answer would be to tell your 13 year old developing human who is struggling that they are gonna be the odd one out. This isn't the same as installing cameras on every corner because kids are getting kidnapped, this is the same thing as saying cigarettes/drugs/alcohol should be for people 18+ when they are old enough to decide for themselves, especially given all those things (and social media) has known negative impacts on developing brains.
- Brybry 4y ago
  Unless you watch your kid like a hawk then they'll be able to get cigarettes/drugs/alcohol as a teenager if they want to. A significant portion of my high school population was drinking alcohol at parties and another (smaller) portion was smoking weed. My understanding from most of my friends and relatives is that their schools were the same. In my opinion kids are far better served by being enabled to safely explore new experiences and methods on how to deal with peer pressure when they don't want to. But really that's up to each parent to decide, they should know their kids best. 18 years old as a magical line for all human beings being equally capable to decide for themselves is a bit silly, if anything 18 year old males might be at the worst time for these experiences. If we wanted a good 'average' age to group everyone into that's based more on current understanding of biology then we'd probably want something more like 25.

ipaddr 4y ago

The answer to you having a difficult time parenting is for everyone to use a government issued id for any content you want to ban your kid from using? Why not install filtering in your home router and kids cellphones?

_-david-_ 4y ago
>Why not install filtering in your home router and kids cellphones? The average parent is incompetent when it comes to technology. They wouldn't know what to use and would likely install some sort of malware. Perhaps Microsoft and Apple could implement something in their systems or the ISPs. If it is up to the parents to find the appropriate solution it just won't work.