5 ms·
Please, read the paper. Again, your view is unimaginative. On the contrary, science fiction is an excellent resource for policy, as it imagines futures where
by upsidesinclude 4y ago
Please, read the paper.
Again, your view is unimaginative.
On the contrary, science fiction is an excellent resource for policy, as it imagines futures where certain policies are carried out to their final conclusions.
- mgraczyk 4y agoWhich paper? The one pointing out that links are easy to determine with only a small genetics database? Why would I care about that, I want law enforcement to have (audited) access to 100% of the populations genetic records, so I'm not concerned about how small a sample is needed.
- upsidesinclude 4y agoFrom user nelox: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9731365/
- mgraczyk 4y agoFrom the paper: > While most people would agree that putting a serial killer behind bars is an acceptable tradeoff, questions are nevertheless growing about who should control the genetic data compiled by genetic testing companies and how that data should be used: Are we willing to give up our genetic information in exchange for more efficient law enforcement, health information, and consumer targeting practices? Yes, I am. It's worth it.
- upsidesinclude 4y agoGreat, you are okay with losing autonomy. I am not and I am not okay with your loss of autonomy. Your acceptance of this loss of autonomy will cost me my autonomy. The benefit is to ensure punishment for a wildly unlikely, tragic thing occurring. I think you don't understand what humans lose.
- mgraczyk 4y agoNo, I just don't believe the genetics database reduces my autonomy any more than going outside or posting a photo of myself online. You're attacking straw men here.
- upsidesinclude 4y agoREAD THE PAPER
- mgraczyk 4y agoI read the entire thing lol. I don't agree with your conclusion. The paper doesn't make that conclusion.