3 ms·
So how much bandwidth were you using, and what proportion of it was images? Like, is it a obviously cut and dry case or is there actually some ambiguity? (Ther
by jsnell 4y ago
So how much bandwidth were you using, and what proportion of it was images? Like, is it a obviously cut and dry case or is there actually some ambiguity?
(There's some very good reasons to leave terms a bit vague rather than specified exactly, but then you probably wouldn't expect enforcement in cases that are ambiguous.)
- tut-urut-utut 4y agoTell me one web site where images and video doesn’t count for most of the size. The time of 35k image on a 50k text page is long gone.
- nebulous1 4y agonews.ycombinator.com
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- geerlingguy 4y agoJust a guess, but I'm wondering if it's more about their system detecting someone serving almost entirely image requests, versus someone serving 20-40 images per web page, a pattern more consistent with images served alongside a web page.
- judge2020 4y agoIt also has to reach a critical point. Serving maybe 100k unique visitors and 1tb in a month isn't that big of a deal, but 100x that might be enough to where you're using a lot more than every other free customer.
- bluedino 4y agoNon-trivial amounts of Javascript for example https://almanac.httparchive.org/static/images/2021/page-weight/bytes-distribution-content-type.png https://almanac.httparchive.org/static/images/2021/page-weig...
- infensus 4y agoHe said "image proxies" so I guess 100%?
- lexx 4y agoWe are a really small business. We have a headless CMS. We just use media for Content purposes. Nothing out of the ordinary.