3 ms·
I don't know how well it works with screen readers, etc., but https://livecode.com https://livecode.com might work well because the code is English-like -- it s
by gcanyon 4y ago
I don't know how well it works with screen readers, etc., but https://livecode.com https://livecode.com might work well because the code is English-like -- it still uses things like [] for arrays and () for precedence in calculations, but in general there is much less use of symbols.
Another possibly odd suggestion is https://www.jsoftware.com/#/README https://www.jsoftware.com/#/README Natively, J is nothing but symbols, but crucially, everything can be redefined. So this is possible:
plus =: +
3 plus 4
7
equals =: =
5 equals 2 plus 3
1
4 equals 2 plus 3
0
It's an array-based language, but it doesn't have to be used that way.
- gcanyon 4y agoReplying to correct line breaks: plus =: + 3 plus 4 7 equals =: = 5 equals 2 plus 3 1 4 equals 2 plus 3 0