> Yes, they did put u”” back in. No it did not destroy the world. This saga isn't completely over, over here: We still have code running python2 that we don't

> Yes, they did put u”” back in. No it did not destroy the world. This saga isn't completely over, over here: We still have code running python2 that we don't have the room to upgrade, and libraries that have to work with both python2 and python3. Meanwhile, people are pushing "code consistency" to the point where people outside our team are taking those libraries and running the "black" formatter on them - but "black" doesn't understand python2, so it removes the "u" prefix and breaks the library.