As a practical matter, this seems like it will only cause meeting makers to spend a bit of extra effort scheduling “non-recurring” meetings periodically. As so

As a practical matter, this seems like it will only cause meeting makers to spend a bit of extra effort scheduling “non-recurring” meetings periodically. As someone who occasionally does schedule meetings, this really is not that challenging, especially if meeting volume is overall low; no conflicts, it takes seconds. Wouldn’t it be better to measure outcomes and sentiment, and allow teams to adapt to what works for them? “Hey your team isn’t really enjoying all the meetings you call, maybe try having fewer to improve your team’s morale?” vs. “No recurring meetings for anyone!”