Oh please. Googling "steve jobs bully pixar" reveals at least one story of horrible behavior directed toward regular staff members. Jobs could be a bully, it's

Oh please. Googling "steve jobs bully pixar" reveals at least one story of horrible behavior directed toward regular staff members. Jobs could be a bully, it's well documented. Pixar wasn't somehow immune to this behavior. You've painted a utilitarian, partisan viewpoint: that the cultural and technological significance of Pixar outweighs any negative experiences of staff. The two are not easily comparable. How do you quantify them, what's the denominator? Jobs didn't have a crystal ball, he couldn't know Pixar would succeed. What was his calculus? How did he determine the trade-offs between success and bullying? Finally, cultural/tech significance is most certainly possible without putting staff through negative experiences.