4 ms·
It was, from the wikipedia: > On May 23, 2014, Apple, Google, Intel, Adobe agreed to settle for $324.5 million. > .. > In June 2014, Judge Lucy Koh expressed
by no_butterscotch 4y ago
It was, from the wikipedia:
> On May 23, 2014, Apple, Google, Intel, Adobe agreed to settle for $324.5 million.
> ..
> In June 2014, Judge Lucy Koh expressed concern that the settlement may not be a good one for the plaintiffs. Michael Devine, one of the plaintiffs, said the settlement is unjust. In a letter he wrote to the judge he said the settlement represents only one-tenth of the $3 billion in compensation the 64,000 workers could have made if the defendants had not colluded.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_Litigation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_L...
- koheripbal 4y agoNo, that was dishonest math. He aggregated ALL TOTAL comp for POTENTIAL employees based upon a BEST-CASE compensation for ALL of them. ...and none of that is realistic. The correct estimate would be the INCREMENTAL comp for the portion of employees that ACTUALLY looked for work with the competitors. Never blindly trust one-side of the story in a damages lawsuit.