4 ms·
> cost of preventing temperatures rising... With a smaller population of 8.7bn, the cost would drop to $471. The second option is cheaper. Interesting, analyzi
by 8bitsrule 4y ago
> cost of preventing temperatures rising... With a smaller population of 8.7bn, the cost would drop to $471. The second option is cheaper.
Interesting, analyzing hypotheticals that are based on loads of half-baked presumptions. It'd be even cheaper with a smaller population of 0.7bn. (Were the huge gains to be made by switching to renewables factored in here?) Maybe mixing those who will never-be-born into this drunken calculus is an attempt to suggest that some humanity is involved?