2 ms·

I'll agree with that. And the appeals court agreed too, that you have to look at all of the facts (percentage, repeated suggestions that he could resign, reduct

by chomp 4y ago

I'll agree with that. And the appeals court agreed too, that you have to look at all of the facts (percentage, repeated suggestions that he could resign, reduction in responsibilities, loss of title). Though I don't think they can use the "I have a lot of bills" argument, as the finances of Mr. Scott aren't relevant in the constructive discharge law.

anonymouskimmer 4y ago
"Though I don't think they can use the "I have a lot of bills" argument, as the finances of Mr. Scott aren't relevant in the constructive discharge law." Probably not, unless they knew beforehand what Mr. Scott's tolerable financial situation was and purposefully reduced his compensation to below that level.