> She's put that belief to work in a set of ethical licenses that resemble conventional open source licenses but add restrictions on activities such as acts of

> She's put that belief to work in a set of ethical licenses that resemble conventional open source licenses but add restrictions on activities such as acts of war or "surveilling or tracking individuals for financial gain." There is nothing ethical about these "ethical" licenses. If open source allowed restrictions on who could use it, we'd end up in a dystopia of "only registered Democrats can use software A, B, and C, and only registered Republicans can use software X, Y, and Z" in no time.