3 ms·

The article said that prediction is by a quack site, with no scientific background, who missed both the real Eureka earthquake and then falsely predicted a magn

The article said that prediction is by a quack site, with no scientific background, who missed both the real Eureka earthquake and then falsely predicted a magnitude 6.5 in Eureka on Dec 25-28.

hammock 4y ago
Yes, take it with a grain of salt
- sjburt 4y ago
  No, don’t “take it with a grain of salt”. Ignore it completely and don’t repeat it. It is complete and utter crap.
  - deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
  - deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]