3 ms·
This[1] and this[2] also come to mind. [1] https://www.spglobal.com/engineering/en/products/haystack-gold.html https://www.spglobal.com/engineering/en/products
by metaphor 4y ago
This[1] and this[2] also come to mind.
[1] https://www.spglobal.com/engineering/en/products/haystack-gold.html https://www.spglobal.com/engineering/en/products/haystack-go...
[2] https://www.plume.com/serviceproviders/platform/haystack/ https://www.plume.com/serviceproviders/platform/haystack/
- _vxw6 4y agoForgive me if I don't understand, but I don't think there's a problem with multiple companies using the same common noun as the base for their domain. Let the best product be remembered for the name.
- metaphor 4y agoCertainly not, presuming it doesn't escalate to the level of trademark/service mark infringement (to be fair, IANAL). Just a risk consideration...your product, your call. But I think there's value in at least recognizing that the namespace is quite crowded given the collisions that two interweb randoms were able to identify in short order.