3 ms·
It is a pretty odd article. Their conclusion is "Parking lot owners think it's not cost-effective but we disagree because solar very cool." with no real justifi
by tredre3 4y ago
It is a pretty odd article. Their conclusion is "Parking lot owners think it's not cost-effective but we disagree because solar very cool." with no real justification.
Actual quote is:
> Parking lot owners may forego solar panels for reasons including cost and inconvenience. However, some solar experts think increased interest in sustainability (90% of Americans wanted more solar farms in 2020, according to Pew) could mean more solar parking lots are headed our way.
- verdverm 4y agoIt's a stretch to call it an article, tbh I wonder if this is AI or the quality college student writing is actually at. Both worry me