3 ms·
> a painting signed with a [facsimile] signature of Dali That's not what's happening here though. If you look at the original tweet (https://twitter.com/Laury
by theptip 4y ago
> a painting signed with a [facsimile] signature of Dali
That's not what's happening here though.
If you look at the original tweet (https://twitter.com/LaurynIpsum/status/1599953586699767808 https://twitter.com/LaurynIpsum/status/1599953586699767808) it seems that the complaint is about the "mangled remains of an artist’s signature". I don't see any examples where it's actually copying the signature of a specific artist.
(Please do share an example of that if there is one.)
- return_to_monke 4y agoI do respect artist's concerns. I have a hard time getting this one though. The ai learned that humans usually put squiggly lines in the corners, and it does, too. What is wrong with this?
- Filligree 4y agoIt's reasoning based on a false assumption. If you start from the assumption that AI imagery is based on specific source images, which had signatures, then it can make sense to assume that the squiggly lines in the corner are evidence that it copied-and-mangled some such specific pictures. That's not what it did, of course. But if you start from the assumption...