I think the reasoning goes something like: 1) corporations are guilty of wage theft and not prosecuted 2) shoplifting harms corporations 3) harming corporati

I think the reasoning goes something like: 1) corporations are guilty of wage theft and not prosecuted 2) shoplifting harms corporations 3) harming corporations is ok because they are guilty. Different in scale, but I think it’s similar to the “it’s ok to punch a Nazi” rationale.