> A language "focused on safety and correctness" where you need to argue because error handling is neglected instead of being put front, and not even the most t

> A language "focused on safety and correctness" where you need to argue because error handling is neglected instead of being put front, and not even the most trivial resource management is thought out (even big sounding terms like "linear types" and "capabilities" were thrown on the table). The OP is complaining about the introductory code samples and how they don't demonstrate the error handling idioms of the language, not any problems with how errors are handled in this language.