4 ms·

In one of the quotes from this article "We think the public will tire of mechanical music and will want the real thing". It seems to me the public is now tiring

In one of the quotes from this article "We think the public will tire of mechanical music and will want the real thing". It seems to me the public is now tiring of CGI explosions at the expense of character based stories in films. 3D was a fad also.

rockemsockem 4y ago
There are many good movies that use CGI explosions. You can't just look at the movies that are bad and say that people don't like them because of the CGI. Also the public doesn't seem to tired of them based on how well marvel movies still do.
- nuc1e0n 4y ago
  Tell me without looking it up, What was the name of the one after infinity war?
  - rockemsockem 4y ago
    I'm not sure what this was supposed to prove. I said the Marvel movies do well, meaning they do well at the box office. I also said that there are great movies that use CGI explosions. I did *not* say that the Marvel movies are great. They most decidedly are not IMO. You don't have to go all Chris Nolan and blow things up for real to make a good movie. Although I do like a real explosion :)
  - deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
  - ribosometronome 4y ago
    I think that the top grossing movies or 2022 are all CGI explosion type movies is better proof that there's still a pretty good appetite for CGI explosion type movies than that I remember it was Endgame.
    - nuc1e0n 4y ago
      The fact they were doesn't mean there's much appetite for them in particular. It may just mean they're cheaper to produce. Also, it wasn't endgame. It was "Ant-Man and the Wasp"
IAmGraydon 4y ago
>It seems to me… I have no doubt that it “seems to you”, but do you have any actual evidence?
- nuc1e0n 4y ago
  I don't really care enough to gather it. Even if I did it would likely be suppressed. Do a straw poll of some random teenagers near you and ask them to tell a story of how they've been wowwed at the movies. Or perhaps the last time they paid to see one at the cinema even?

rockemsockem 4y ago

There are many good movies that use CGI explosions. You can't just look at the movies that are bad and say that people don't like them because of the CGI. Also the public doesn't seem to tired of them based on how well marvel movies still do.

nuc1e0n 4y ago
Tell me without looking it up, What was the name of the one after infinity war?
- rockemsockem 4y ago
  I'm not sure what this was supposed to prove. I said the Marvel movies do well, meaning they do well at the box office. I also said that there are great movies that use CGI explosions. I did *not* say that the Marvel movies are great. They most decidedly are not IMO. You don't have to go all Chris Nolan and blow things up for real to make a good movie. Although I do like a real explosion :)
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- ribosometronome 4y ago
  I think that the top grossing movies or 2022 are all CGI explosion type movies is better proof that there's still a pretty good appetite for CGI explosion type movies than that I remember it was Endgame.
  - nuc1e0n 4y ago
    The fact they were doesn't mean there's much appetite for them in particular. It may just mean they're cheaper to produce. Also, it wasn't endgame. It was "Ant-Man and the Wasp"

IAmGraydon 4y ago

>It seems to me… I have no doubt that it “seems to you”, but do you have any actual evidence?

nuc1e0n 4y ago
I don't really care enough to gather it. Even if I did it would likely be suppressed. Do a straw poll of some random teenagers near you and ask them to tell a story of how they've been wowwed at the movies. Or perhaps the last time they paid to see one at the cinema even?