> correlation of .28 ... That's not exactly the trivial "4% less likely" effect in your caricature. You clearly don't know how to interpret correlation. A corr

> correlation of .28 ... That's not exactly the trivial "4% less likely" effect in your caricature. You clearly don't know how to interpret correlation. A correlation of .28 is virtually uninformative. https://www.academia.edu/39797871/Fooled_by_Correlation_Common_Misinterpretations_in_Social_Science_ https://www.academia.edu/39797871/Fooled_by_Correlation_Comm...