I agree that this was not a specific case of PP choosing to be vile and destroy a violin but it's still inexcusable to have a one-solution scenario and keep rob

I agree that this was not a specific case of PP choosing to be vile and destroy a violin but it's still inexcusable to have a one-solution scenario and keep robotic, unquestioning staff incapable of providing the human element to problem resolution. This is a case of a corporation dictating legal policy based on their legal interpretation. I am not even sure if they are masking it as legal policy really. I am really wishing/waiting for a responsible company to be able to enter the international online payments arena but I don't see this happening anytime soon.