4 ms·
Good for them. Not that much for ecological reasons, though. The point of your parent was, I believe, that it's not your place to decide for others.
by throwaway744678 4y ago
Good for them. Not that much for ecological reasons, though.
The point of your parent was, I believe, that it's not your place to decide for others.
- nuc1e0n 4y agoexactly
- theCrowing 4y ago[flagged]
- nuc1e0n 4y agoApparently, three-quarters of Earth's food supply draws on just 12 crops and five livestock species. Is that a good thing? a bad thing? Or, as I believe, not really either good or bad. That situation has been sustained for quite a while already right?
- pessimizer 4y ago> three-quarters of Earth's food supply draws on just 12 crops and five livestock species. All of the biodiversity on the planet is reducing to 12 crops and five livestock species, at least by weight.
- nuc1e0n 4y agoWhy do we not choose to broaden the range of species that we cultivate? Are most just another species of rat or weed? Maybe more varieties of carrot are just better. Or just more carrots in general for that matter.