3 ms·
We can keep the discussion going but I don't see why? Polymorphism is not part of OOP it's much more universal then that. It can be used by OOP the same way nu
by fckgnad 4y ago
We can keep the discussion going but I don't see why?
Polymorphism is not part of OOP it's much more universal then that. It can be used by OOP the same way numbers can be used as in OOP programming. But numbers are not hierarchically under the umbrella of OOP.
I mean what is the point you're trying to make here? That polymorphism is fundamentally and categorically OOP? Are you saying that anything that uses polymorphism (which is almost every language under the sun) is OOP?
>Do you also want Simon Peyton Jones point of view on Haskell type classes and OOP relate to each other?
No? Wouldn't that be a completely different topic?
- pjmlp 4y agoAll worthy candidates to successor languages to C++ also support OOP in some form, that is the point. Not the OOP from all I know is Java, rather the OOP from SIGPLAN, ECOOP, IEEE, ACM papers, which happen to have polymorphism as one of the common features across all variations of what can be considered as an OOP capable language.
- fckgnad 4y ago[dead]