You can still get code coverage points with broader tests. I think it’s reasonable to disavow expecting single unit tests for nearly every method on every clas

You can still get code coverage points with broader tests. I think it’s reasonable to disavow expecting single unit tests for nearly every method on every class with mock/boilerplate/copy-paste hell. However, I would still expect “local integration” unit tests that exercise broader chunks of code and keep code coverage up. So it should be “I don’t need to write a new unit test for this because an existing unit test calls the method that calls this method without it being mocked and you can see it’s covered in the code coverage.”