2 ms·
Somewhat surprisingly, this seems to be basically a pro 'defund the police' argument in the end. > “If you have an effective criminal-justice system, and you h
by jrochkind1 4y ago
Somewhat surprisingly, this seems to be basically a pro 'defund the police' argument in the end.
> “If you have an effective criminal-justice system, and you have effective community partners that are assisting towards long-term community transformation, then, yes, traditional security models—the security model of observe and report—works,” he says. “But when you have a breakdown in societal connectivity, you lose the ability to operate out of that business model. So we had to come up with something unique and different.”
And what they came up with is something with probably better outcomes (in terms of reducing violence) than law enforcement.
Of course, there is no guarantee that private security will remain "social service-y".
- Ygg2 4y ago>Of course, there is no guarantee that private security will remain "social service-y". I think it's bound to happen. Money creeps in, the police officers are too expensive to maintain. They get replaced by blender drones. Luckily, all media will be privatized and anyone reporting might end up in a blender drone accident.