3 ms·
That's not the point. There's still a difference between arguing in the abstract "my interpretation of the doctrine says this is permitted" and "I support and a
by imgabe 4y ago
That's not the point. There's still a difference between arguing in the abstract "my interpretation of the doctrine says this is permitted" and "I support and advocate doing this". Even the 13th Amendment permits slavery for prisoners.
It reads much more like a pedantic nerd who wants to argue the technicalities of the rules rather than someone who's just itchin' to own some slaves.
- maxbond 4y agoI guess? It's not a distinction with a very compelling difference. (The 13th amendment is wrong, morally speaking, to do so.) > It reads much more like a pedantic nerd who wants to argue the technicalities of the rules rather than someone who's just itchin' to own some slaves. I think if you understood the context better you may feel differently.