3 ms·
Could it be many still need CUDA and hence unless they can somehow fit in Nvidia they … But they do not want to. Hence not sure what is the point other than th
by ngcc_hk 4y ago
Could it be many still need CUDA and hence unless they can somehow fit in Nvidia they … But they do not want to. Hence not sure what is the point other than they can win the war against CUDA.
- alkonaut 4y agoCUDA or not, I don't think many will buy a mac pro unless it delivers what the last one did in terms of Graphics. And that probably requires at least using separate graphics card in the several-hundred-watt class. They obviously aren't going to shove a 400W graphics card into the SoC and they aren't going to shrink the power requirements by an order of magnitude for GPUs. An they also aren't going to enter the business of making discrete pro graphics cards. nvidia and AMD can afford to do that research work because it trickles down to consumer/gamer cards. But Apple surely can't motivate that research expense. So the only thing that makes sense is to either make no Mac pro tower workstation with discrete GPUs at all, or doing what they did last time, using third party cards.