3 ms·
The article seems to argue that point 2 is strictly false, or a red herring: humans can do the science on earth, while robots collect data in space. Point 4 se
by komali2 4y ago
The article seems to argue that point 2 is strictly false, or a red herring: humans can do the science on earth, while robots collect data in space.
Point 4 seems more a political/economic failure than a valid reason to pour resources into a Mars project.
- throw_pm23 4y agoYes, and Point 3 is a fancy version of the broken window fallacy, while Point 1 is a BS "appeal to nature" that can be used to justify anything, including some of the worst things.