4 ms·
If you're using stable diffusion 2.0 or later you can use its depth-to-image mode[0] to create variations of an image which respect its composition without havi
by Agentlien 4y ago
If you're using stable diffusion 2.0 or later you can use its depth-to-image mode[0] to create variations of an image which respect its composition without having to keep your parameters within a narrow range.
[0] https://github.com/Stability-AI/stablediffusion#image-modification-with-stable-diffusion https://github.com/Stability-AI/stablediffusion#image-modifi...
- siraben 4y agoI still struggle with SD 2.0 prompting because many of the tricks (greg, artstation) don't work anymore, have people had success with it or do I have to use custom models?
- speedgoose 4y agoYou need other tricks and put a bit more thoughts in the negative prompt. The quality is then higher but you really need a good prompt. It’s a bit frustrating compared to midjourney or dall.e. You should take a look at embeddings too. They are tiny files, no more than 128kB, that have a huge influence on the final output. You put the files in the embeddings folder and use the filename in your prompt. Ideally the filename is a unique word so it doesn’t interfere with the normal prompt logic. You can find the best embeddings in the stable diffusion discord.
- Agentlien 4y ago> The quality is then higher but you really need a good prompt. I've seen this stated but it has not been my experience. Nor have I seen solid examples of it. For 2.0 (haven't tried 2.1) I find the model very finicky and unstable. Any prompt which works well also seems to work at least as well in 1.5.