3 ms·
That's not a reason not to. That's a reason to also send out robots.
by wilg 4y ago
That's not a reason not to. That's a reason to also send out robots.
- cmdli 4y agoBudgets are always going to be finite, and eventually you will have to choose. Until we run out of space to explore with robots, we don't really need to send out humans.
- wilg 4y agoThere is no "need" with exploring. Just do both. We'll learn more about living on other planets if we actually do it.
- wilsonnb3 4y agoI can see how cheaper and easier can be viewed as 'not a reason not to' but the crux of the issue is that robots will do a better job than humans anyways. Why spend more money and effort to do something less effective?
- spiderice 4y agoBecause it is cool and inspiring. This doesn't have to be about min-maxing.
- holler 4y agoMy thought exactly, well said.