3 ms·

Anyone with a direct or indirect stake in one of the few companies silly enough to throw it on their balance sheet. Since TSLA made the S&P that's basically eve

Anyone with a direct or indirect stake in one of the few companies silly enough to throw it on their balance sheet. Since TSLA made the S&P that's basically everyone with a market investment, an IRA, a 401(k), a pension. CPPIB invested in FTX. CDPQ in Celsius. Everyone in El Salvador. It's a bit of a cancer. Anyways those doing the foisting also includes all the shills, the laser-eyed, the influencers. [edit] It's not enough to say because they weren't forced at gunpoint, it's not coercive or immoral. We don't accept that behavior from people shilling penny stocks. And of course Salvadoran shopowners were in fact coerced with force.

gruez 4y ago
>Anyone with a direct or indirect stake in one of the few companies silly enough to throw it on their balance sheet Sure, there are institutional investors holding crypto, but how is this related to the current discussion of securing crypto? They're not exactly keeping their crypto holdings in a software wallet connected to the internet. They typically outsource that to companies that specialize in crypto custody, which presumably have better security practices than the OP.
- w1nst0nsm1th 4y ago
  Cryptos are 2500 years of financial frauds, bubbles, greed and insanity concentrated in 13 years of existence. It preys of financially illiterate people who don't know better because they have been bombarded without any pause by endless list of bullshit as soon as they put the word 'investment', 'money', 'market' or whatever in any search box in the world, that being the one from your local bookstore, online newspapers, youtube, google, reddit and on and on and on... And if you tell me fractional banking system is a ponzi scheme then you either don't have a clue of what they are or you pretend to. It doesn't matter which companies, individuals or wathever .org or 'coin something' websites promote them or make a business of them because they're all fucking hucksters at worst or paid shills at best. Talking 'security' about investment scams is like talking personnal safety in '101 suicide' book.

gruez 4y ago

>Anyone with a direct or indirect stake in one of the few companies silly enough to throw it on their balance sheet Sure, there are institutional investors holding crypto, but how is this related to the current discussion of securing crypto? They're not exactly keeping their crypto holdings in a software wallet connected to the internet. They typically outsource that to companies that specialize in crypto custody, which presumably have better security practices than the OP.

w1nst0nsm1th 4y ago
Cryptos are 2500 years of financial frauds, bubbles, greed and insanity concentrated in 13 years of existence. It preys of financially illiterate people who don't know better because they have been bombarded without any pause by endless list of bullshit as soon as they put the word 'investment', 'money', 'market' or whatever in any search box in the world, that being the one from your local bookstore, online newspapers, youtube, google, reddit and on and on and on... And if you tell me fractional banking system is a ponzi scheme then you either don't have a clue of what they are or you pretend to. It doesn't matter which companies, individuals or wathever .org or 'coin something' websites promote them or make a business of them because they're all fucking hucksters at worst or paid shills at best. Talking 'security' about investment scams is like talking personnal safety in '101 suicide' book.