3 ms·
I think there are two main reasons for that: 1) web1 and even web2 was largely by/for nerds. These things eventually became mainstream but there was a non-ubiq
by azinman2 4y ago
I think there are two main reasons for that:
1) web1 and even web2 was largely by/for nerds. These things eventually became mainstream but there was a non-ubiquitousness for the core concepts or at least audience. We now are asymptotically 100% mainstream.
2) web3 is principally based on “money”, or things that involve money in some way. That will always bring grifters, and the fact that some random non-tech non-SV-idealist-coming-from-the-60s-counter-culture-movement person can now seize an opportunity for a dodgy way to make money will brings lots of those people. Then you add in Miami which seems to be a home to a lot of these things, with a culture that reinforces material displays of wealth, and you have a huge force for not good with whatever web3 is supposed to be.
- slowmovintarget 4y agoEven worse... There was a web 3 already, and it had nothing to do with blockchain. It was HTML 5 + CSS 3 and SPAs. It just became so ubiquitous that no one thought of it by the term. Now the cool kids are headed back to the server. The new name is because too few business types know what the "www" on web sites stands for.