5 ms·
It’s not made obvious by the article, but this lawsuit is for non-payment on a lease of one floor of 650 California St, not for non-payment on the 1355 Market S
by nrp 4y ago
It’s not made obvious by the article, but this lawsuit is for non-payment on a lease of one floor of 650 California St, not for non-payment on the 1355 Market St headquarters. They are also not paying rent at the latter, so presumably another lawsuit is coming. My assumption though is that they have already vacated the now extraneous space at 650 California and will settle with the landlord to break the lease.
- rubyist5eva 4y ago[flagged]
- dragonwriter 4y agoNot the only, or biggest, nonpayment lawsuit they are facing: https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Bay-Area-software-company-sues-Twitter-for-breach-17660241.php https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Bay-Area-softwar...
- nervlord 4y ago[dead]
- rchaud 4y agoThe article references the NYT as reporting they're not paying rent anywhere: > Twitter hasn’t paid rent on its headquarters, or any of its other global offices, in weeks, the New York Times reported on Dec. 13.
- jacooper 4y agoUse this simple trick to immediately lower your companie's cost!
- rchaud 4y agoI kid you not, there is a Dilbert strip that is effectively the pointy-haired boss saying "In an effort to streamline operations and cut costs, we've decided to start stealing stuff". I'm paraphrasing, but it really was a one-liner like that.