2 ms·
Given that this is a ratio, with both a denominator and a numerator, we should step carefully when declaring which part of the ratio seems abnormal. Either side
by lkrubner 4y ago
Given that this is a ratio, with both a denominator and a numerator, we should step carefully when declaring which part of the ratio seems abnormal. Either side of the ratio could be wrong, but for different causes. If, for instance, women were facing persistent discrimination, then their income would seem low relative to their education, but the causal effect would be the opposite of what is suggested by the words:
"Women Are Overinvesting in Education for the Monetary Returns."
If the other side of the ratio is suppressed, then it would be more accurate to write:
"Women are underpaid in monetary returns for their education."
- scarmig 4y agoThe reframing leaves it as a passive thing that just happens. A bit more revealing of the assumptions involved would be "Organizations undercompensate women in monetary terms for their education." Which suggests the question, do women get paid less than men once matched for education, hours worked, profession, etc.?