106 ms·
>You're preaching at me about neutral sources while throwing conservative AM talk radio and Rupert Murdoch newspaper links my way. That's kind of ironic and hyp
by notadev 4y ago
>You're preaching at me about neutral sources while throwing conservative AM talk radio and Rupert Murdoch newspaper links my way. That's kind of ironic and hypocritical.
I just did a quick Google to find the links, but is there anything specific in either of them that was incorrect?
I’m aware of how definitions work and change, but these were changed for political reasons, not because society writ large changed. I’m also intimately familiar with the multiple definitions of “run” as I’ve had to write them all by hand, several times, during detention in my secondary school years. Perhaps you should read the definition for caution, because it’s certainly not preaching.
- dangus 4y agoSociety actually did change on LGBT acceptance, on a quantitative level. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1651/gay-lesbian-rights.aspx https://news.gallup.com/poll/1651/gay-lesbian-rights.aspx
- notadev 4y agoWe’re not talking about LGB, just the T. Aside from being OK with them serving in the military, other trans issues are either split down the middle or in the Disapprove category. Not sure why “gender identity” is lumped in with the other sexual orientations except for the purpose of co-opting.