2 ms·
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the combined size of an image and its complementary CSS file is less than the size of a 129kb CSS file with "CSS3 images", then
by atarian 15y ago
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the combined size of an image and its complementary CSS file is less than the size of a 129kb CSS file with "CSS3 images", then don't you essentially lose the benefit of reducing server load?
- dextorious 15y agoSure. That's why I added the "imaginary" qualifier to the savings. I just wanted to clarify that the savings the other commenters talk about were taken from the server point of you.