3 ms·
> Sharing some software for free is passive. Selecting a specific open source license and issuing releases and bug fixes is pretty far from “passive.” Passive
by D13Fd 4y ago
> Sharing some software for free is passive.
Selecting a specific open source license and issuing releases and bug fixes is pretty far from “passive.”
Passive would be not putting the code software online and not inviting others to use it.
- vineyardmike 4y ago> Selecting a specific open source license Its a one-time action. Its "set and forget". That's pretty passive. Yes, you took a direct action, but its not an ongoing action. > issuing releases and bug fixes Again, after each fix, you're done. And to the original point, you're never committing to anything. To repeat my original point, a maintainer could die and the software would still be shared, and the companies that use it would have the exact same relationship they had prior.