>Once you are arguing in terms of whether you are not ablist or anti-bad enough, you have already taken the bait, and you are arguing at a disadvantage within t

>Once you are arguing in terms of whether you are not ablist or anti-bad enough, you have already taken the bait, and you are arguing at a disadvantage within the inconsistent framework of rules in the critical theory, The best way to escape quick sands is to actively avoid getting into quick sands. This is such a poignant analysis of these -isms. Do you have any recommended readings by any chance?