3 ms·
You see it differently but it's just not accurate, it's not in the guidelines super-explicitly so easy to miss. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22910444 h
by pvg 4y ago
You see it differently but it's just not accurate, it's not in the guidelines super-explicitly so easy to miss.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22910444 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22910444
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16131314 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16131314 and there are many many others
Yeah, I see who you are.
I'm literally a random scold on the internet, I just happen to be right about this.
- chiefalchemist 4y agoI disagree. I'm not going to explain why. How does that feel? What value does it add? (Sweet FA, eh.) You're right, you might be right. But that does make it right. I get zero satisfaction from context-less down votes. I don't do them. I ignore them when I get them (i.e., they have zero influence on my HN behavior). If I'm changing my mind over some lazy a-holes' click, I'm losing. Big time. I can't imagine why anyone feels any differently. The reality is, there are pointless noise. There's not enough context to drive anything actionable for anybody. But while I have your attention: how about a feature request: Karma points that consider the discussion below a top-parent comment.