4 ms·
I wish I had more data on it, but I've seen many different sources saying the same thing, but the number has more closely approximated 2.5% here, and so I'm won
by KerryJones 4y ago
I wish I had more data on it, but I've seen many different sources saying the same thing, but the number has more closely approximated 2.5% here, and so I'm wondering if there is discrepancy, or this is within the range of statistical accuracy of one or both.
- jppope 4y ago(OP) its hard to have an exact percentage because it's (crude) observation - I could totally go with 2.5%. The number is in the low single digits for sure, but definitely higher than a rounding error (or a null-hypothesis). Whatever the number is, it's high enough to impact the people that have to interact with lots of other people - they feel it, which is really what I was getting at.