5 ms·
I was with you all the way until the api example. That doesn’t look ergonomic, it’s verbose AF, and the ugly use of f! is (like most crates that lean heavily i
by wokwokwok 4y ago
I was with you all the way until the api example.
That doesn’t look ergonomic, it’s verbose AF, and the ugly use of f! is (like most crates that lean heavily into macros) going break tooling like the intellij rust plugin.
Does rust really need another web framework?
Does it need a compiles-to-rust meta language that means you cant easily see the actual rust code you’re using?
Does this feel ergonomic enough to make it worthwhile the downsides of the first two?
Hm.
- rhodysurf 4y agoYeah I don’t get it. The Axum example is pretty easy and the actix counterpart would be easier. The pavex api looks way messier, but maybe it’s cuz I came to rust as an express and flask user
- pryelluw 4y agoIt’s Java written in Rust. :shrugs:
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- colejohnson66 4y agoMetaprogramming/macros are my biggest gripe with Rust. Sure, they're cool, but they're annoying when they're thrown all over the place. Especially proc-macros. You have no idea what it's actually doing unless you hunt it down.