3 ms·
From the article: """That a person can unequivocally declare every other web framework in the world as failures – is just precious."""" That a person cannot fa
by dextorious 15y ago
From the article: """That a person can unequivocally declare every other web framework in the world as failures – is just precious.""""
That a person cannot fathom that it's entirely possible that "we're (all) doing it wrong" is just priceless.
How about the CGI era? Should we have all stuck with that, still using CGI interfaces in whatever language? Yeah, all or almost all solutions at the time were DOING IT WRONG.
It's not even that uncommon. Take Java EE for another example. Almost all frameworks circa 2003-2006 were this bloated mess. Not only the official Sun EE frameworks but tons of libraries and additional third-party stuff was using the same bloated, messy, XML-laden, inefficient style. And they found out they were all DOING IT WRONG, and changed course.
In general, the response article is mostly smart-assy ill attempts at humor.