3 ms·
> Nukes would be a big nuisance, needing constant maintenance, unless you just run a naked pile at incandescent temperature and catch the light coming off photo
by cryptonector 4y ago
> Nukes would be a big nuisance, needing constant maintenance, unless you just run a naked pile at incandescent temperature and catch the light coming off photovoltaically.
If we had piles of Pu-240 we could use RTGs, though they wouldn't be very efficient considering the amount of mass we'd have to send.
Running a naked reactor doesn't sound so bad considering there's no atmosphere or water sources to poison -- just stay away from the reactor. Running a steam turbine shouldn't be too hard, but it probably can't be serviced -- if it breaks, you replace it.
- wbl 4y agoSealed free piston Stirling engines might be even lower maintenance and can provide a number of kilowatts pretty simply. Couple with a fast reactor or a combined fuel moderator solution alas TRIGA should work.
- 8bitsrule 4y agoI suppose that a nuke could work out better than the PM-3A did for McMurdo back in 1962.