3 ms·
The founding premise of positive emotions from human service personel result it better client satisfaction is bogus. First: these humans are more like robots wi
by mihaaly 4y ago
The founding premise of positive emotions from human service personel result it better client satisfaction is bogus. First: these humans are more like robots with heavily regulated and trained kind of interactions seemingly following predetermined scripts, not human-like at all. Robotic. More like carring out an excuse for ticking the 'have client support' on the cheklist of running a business, but without actually doing it. Two: inattentive incompetency and pushing company agenda down the throat of the client - which is the usual attitude - will not be neautralized with the words of 'excited', 'happy', 'glad', and other dishonesty, regardless if a human or AI does it. I seen a screenshot once, saved it:
Support agent: How are you today?
Client: Not good.
Support agent: I am happy to hear that. How may I help you?
With years of bitter disappointment I reached the point of rather discontinuing a service instead of attempting communications with the support department. Of the several dozens of communications about 80% ended up in wasted time and nothing wrapped in pretentious politenes. No resolution but robotic and empty words. Of these half of the cases did not attempt making an effort comprehending the problem before throwing at me the first prepared phrase came to mind just to rush closing the damn ticket on their side (several rushed me to declare closed case before outcome was even possible - e.g. dependent on something delivered later). And almost all have the audacity to send a followup survey about satisfaction with the support.
No, polite words will make no difference, not at all. Only real help will. Be it grumpy or overflown with joy.
- malshe 4y agoThis is a bizarre comment. Studies report average effects, not individual effects. Just because your experience doesn't match what they find on average, the study doesn't become bogus!
- mihaaly 4y agoYou should consider the high number of 'measures' and the negative objective outcomes (being unhelpful) coupled with not paying attention, pushing scripts over situation specific needs. Too much of coincidence over different organizations and broad type of areas to consider just one off experience, more like a trend. With rare exceptions. Of course calling bogus becuase of 'robots' provide the support where human interaction is expected part is a rhetoric here. : ) (not the unhelpfulness of pretty phrasing in place of efficiency though, that's fact)