The person you’re replying to is saying that Python meets their needs. Judging by what they’ve said about their use case, I doubt it’s a meaningful affirm to th

The person you’re replying to is saying that Python meets their needs. Judging by what they’ve said about their use case, I doubt it’s a meaningful affirm to their overall pipeline. Your counterpoint is that it’d be slower if it were running on a Pentium 4. Do you honestly think that they don’t know this? Yes, this is precisely the point. Things are at a point where Python’s benefits are worth more than what another language would bring in speed improvements. I imagine that there would be less of a benefit to busses if we had to Flintstone them everywhere instead using a combustion engine. That’s not the current reality though.