https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus#Reliability_of_the_biblical_account https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus#Reliability_of_the_... https://en.wikipedi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus#Reliability_of_the_biblical_account https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus#Reliability_of_the_... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses#Historicity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses#Historicity I know it is not satisfying, but essentially all of modern biblical scholarship no longer consider these (among others) are factual. This is held by believers and non-believers in the field alike. There is not a single paper to cite, its the result of decades of research with the field slowly settling on this as the result of hundreds of papers, studies, and books. In particular, you won't find a paper entitled "Modern Biblical Criticism rejects X", as it is not original research and worthy of publication. A book like Thomas Romer's "The Invention of God" goes through a bunch of the pro/con evidence and various theories and proposals put forth. And here is a paper by Romer that just summarily states that modern research has abandoned the documentary hypothesis, but doesn't really offer support for that as it is a well known point within the field that doesn't require re-litigation: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03820791/document https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03820791/document