3 ms·
The cookie law wasn't half as shitty as the lazy ways companies adhere to it. But even that I'll take any day over the time before the cookie law (which, BTW, i
by tgv 4y ago
The cookie law wasn't half as shitty as the lazy ways companies adhere to it. But even that I'll take any day over the time before the cookie law (which, BTW, is much more extensive than just regulating cookies).
- tempestn 4y agoIf a law results in companies taking actions that annoy and impede hundreds of millions of people in aggregate, there's something wrong with the law. Governments need to consider the actual effects when they write laws, not what the effects would be in an ideal world.
- throwarayda 4y agoThe law doesn't result in the companies taking actions that annoy, that is the decision of the company. Why do you absolve the company of any and all responsibility?
- ben_w 4y agoThe law causes malicious compliance therefore it's a bad law? Well, sure. However, quite a lot of the websites aren't actually in compliance in the first place. For example, this Christmas I had to remind a company that me placing an order was not permission for them to email me a survey asking how good the delivery was — customers aren't a free QA team.
- tempestn 4y agoA law that results in negative outcomes outweighing the positive ones is a bad law, yes.
- agjmills 4y agoLike all US tax law?
- tempestn 4y agoA lot of tax law is bad, yes. I certainly wouldn't say all though.
- pishpash 4y agoMaybe they should have worked out some basic scenarios and written the law with those in mind?
- ilyt 4y agoThat what appears to what happened with GDPR, it is much more sensible and covers the common "workarounds" of making the reject harder or blocking the site content if you reject