3 ms·
I find the general defaults in most Wayland compositors to be much more pleasant than X-org defaults. Libinput and Pipewire in particular solve a huge selectio
by horsawlarway 4y ago
I find the general defaults in most Wayland compositors to be much more pleasant than X-org defaults.
Libinput and Pipewire in particular solve a huge selection of issues I would routinely run into on linux machines in the 2010's.
Not limited to wayland, but definitely pushed by wayland and developed in tandom with a similar set of goals (renovate mostly legacy spaces that are critical in the end-user space).
I have also - not ever - had to touch a terminal/file editor to make an external display work with wayland. Which... is just hands down pleasant. And frankly an experience that does not exist with X. For the most part - I just plug it an and things work as expected. Including much better scaling/hidpi support.
Honestly - not having to mess with conf files for basic input/output has been a hallmark of my experience with Wayland.
I enjoy quite a bit more deep diving in linux than most any typical user (I run arch as a daily driver and host about 15 apps in a k8s cluster in my basement - I'm not afraid of some configuration), but I'm tired of wasting time making devices work like they should. Personally - I don't find that experience enjoyable or satisfying. I'd like my mouse/touchpad/monitor/headset to just work when I connect them, and wayland based compositors seem to get those mostly right.
I switched 5 years ago - back when screen sharing was still... rough, and a lot of the benefits weren't present because major applications (namely - browsers) were still running in Xwayland. The experience today is just downright pleasant. I enjoy my wayland boxes far more than my work macbook, and the last hold-out has been a Windows 10 box for games, which thanks to valve and wine will not be getting upgraded to windows 11.