> They are routinely overstepping the bounds of civil behavior... What does that even mean? Your argument starts with a statement everyone agrees with, you as

> They are routinely overstepping the bounds of civil behavior... What does that even mean? Your argument starts with a statement everyone agrees with, you assert something that's a stretch to believe at best. Then you just start making things up. Finally you assert that absurd action needs to be taken. Why is it possible to burn the FBI to the ground but not reform civil forfeiture? You need to ask yourself who would benefit from dismantling the FBI, because the FBI does a lot more than civil forfeiture. The same goes for the Post Office and IRS. Someone else has a lot more to gain from dismantling those institutions than you do. They're just riling you up to carry out their agenda.